A
Feasibility Study
As noted in the Overview, because addressing long-range issues will involve
many challenges and stakeholders with many different perspectives, we
believe it is important to first conduct an in-depth feasibility study
to:
- Assess
the need and shortcomings of existing related efforts
- Study
the factors and options to address those needs and shortcomings
- Produce
and prioritize recommendations and strategies
- Act as
a means of guidance for going forward
Core
team in place to conduct study:
- Mark
Lupisella, Ph.D., Co-Founder and Acting Director, The Horizons Project
- Jerome
C. Glenn, Executive Director, American Council for the United Nations
University and Director of the Millennium Project
- James
A. Dator, Ph.D., Director of the Hawaii Research Center for Futures
Studies, Social Science Research Institute, University of Hawaii.
- James
A. Dewar, Ph.D., Director of Research Quality Assurance at RAND
and Director of the RAND Frederick S. Pardee Center for Longer Range
Global Policy and the Future Human Condition
- Christopher
B. Jones, Ph.D., Secretary-General of the World Futures Studies
Federation
- David
Fromkin, Ph.D., Director of the Frederick S. Pardee Center for the
Study of the Longer-Range Future, and Professor of International Relations,
History and Law, Boston University.
- Research
assistants are presently being considered
Some questions to be addressed in the study:
- Why are
international mechanisms/organizations for long-range survival and development
needed?
- Should
there be one high-level coordinating organization or more?
- What are
the challenges in forming and making such mechanisms effective?
- Can these
challenges be met? If so, how? If not, why not, and what are some
alternatives?
- What are
the best approaches for forming and operating such mechanisms?
- What is
the value to all stakeholders?
Related to the above are other questions such as:
- What might
be the purview of the body? What specific problems might it address?
- How feasible
is it, or will it be in the future, to proactively discern presently
unknown threats?
- What might
be the best institutional homes for such mechanisms?
- What are
the envisioned research needs and how can they be most effectively satisfied?
- What is
good futures research? How is it best used?
- How feasible
is "guided/conscious evolution", and how effectively can a
global political body contribute to it?
Some
possible mechanisms to explore in the study:
UN Committee
for the Long-Range Future
- Primarily
advisory role in beginning? Evolving into something more action oriented
later?
- Consider
Finland's permanent Committee for the Future as starting point for a
model
- Having
voting members could increase credibility and commitment for implementation
- Might
start with purview of survival threats and take on broader long-range
development challenges later
- Scenario
building and developing mitigation strategies would be key activities
- Could
draft treaties as needed to help with implementation and compliance
- World
Coalition for the Long-Range Future, a collection of think tanks, institutes,
etc. could provide intellectual support and have additional source of
funding
- Global
cost-benefit analysis of space activities could help assess long-term
resource allocation issues
- Foster
futures studies programs in academia
- Might
also be named UN Committee for Long-Range Survival and Development
UN Office
for the Long-Range Future could leverage and coordinate existing organizations
to rigorously address long-range survival and development challenges for
both individual organizations as well as organizationally cross-cutting
challenges.
International
Commission on the Long-Range Future could consist of many countries
coming together to address long-range challenges and possibly form treaties
or other international legal agreements/instruments that would foster
confidence-building regarding commitment via compliance to resource commitments
and agreed upon mitigation/implementation strategies.
World
Futures Research Organization could consist of an international pool
and/or coalition of organizations that would be formally connected (perhaps
legally mandated) to policy makers. What's missing from present organizations
of this nature is the strong political connection.
"Foundation"
model might consist of a political committee that prioritizes problems
and provides guidelines and allocates funds to countries that propose
promising mitigation strategies and implementation plans - that may also
align with individual countries' major long-range challenges.
"Self-organizing"
model could consist of countries that might "self-assemble"
into teams which would commit their own resources (with possible matching
funds contributed by global political body/committee) for conducting research,
developing strategies, and implementing actions for specific long-range
challenges.
Proof-of-Concept/Evolutionary
approach might involve ad hoc committees/teams that could address
easier threats to prove it can be done. This can contribute to an evolutionary
approach that would start with less formal mechanisms with a longer term
strategy for evolution into more formal political mechanisms.
These possibilities
are certainly not exhaustive or mutually exclusive. There is much overlap,
and the feasibility study would provide an analysis and assessment of
all promising options.
Home
Overview Raising
Awareness Contact
|